TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Accardi v. Davidson

Accardi v. Davidson and Zahn, Administratrix of the Estate of Zahn v. Davidson

Accardi v. Davidson, 469 U.S. 899 (1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 9, 1984
Docket
Nos. 84-229; No. 84-5052
Judges
Consideration, Petitions, Took
Citations
469 U.S. 899105 S. Ct. 27583 L. Ed. 2d 21153 U.S.L.W. 32705 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 26401984 U.S. LEXIS 3968

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1988: 11991: 119882026peak 1988 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Whitfield v. Cohen682 F. Supp. 188 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)
  2. Starr v. JCI Data Processing, Inc.767 F. Supp. 633 (D.N.J. 1991)

Most recent

  1. Starr v. JCI Data Processing, Inc.767 F. Supp. 633 (D.N.J. 1991)
  2. Whitfield v. Cohen682 F. Supp. 188 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list