TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Coussens v. Carpenters District Council

Coussens v. Carpenters District Council of Detroit, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, AFL-CIO Shelby County Sheriff's Department v. Ruiz Kavanagh v. McShea Green v. Oklahoma Ronson v. Commissioner of Correction of the State of New York Shannon v. DeRobertis, Warden Smith v. Union Mutual Life Insurance Co. Schreiber v. Gencorp, Inc. Gabriel v. Interstate Commerce Commission Clear-View Cable T. V., Inc. v. Town of Narrows Collins v. Francis, Warden Owens v. Illinois Owens v. Illinois Hatch v. Mason

Coussens v. Carpenters Dist. Council, 469 U.S. 1143 (1985)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 7, 1985
Docket
Nos. 83-1710; No. 83-1908; No. 83-2039; No. 83-6633; No. 83-6777; No. 83-6840; No. 83-6996; No. 84-175; No. 84-343; No. 84-408; No. 84-5045; No. 84-5170; No. 84-5175; No. 84-5292
Citations
469 U.S. 1143105 S. Ct. 826

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ante, p. 818;

ante, p. 1016;

ante, p. 831;

ante, p. 980;

ante, p. 841;

ante, p. 931;

ante, p. 981;

ante, p. 858;

ante, p. 932;

ante, p. 925;

ante, p. 963;

ante, p. 963;

ante, p. 963; and ante, p. 886. Petitions for rehearing denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1987: 11988: 11989: 119872026peak 1987 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States of America ex rel. Miguel A. Espinoza v. J.W. Fairman, Warden813 F.2d 117 (7th Cir. 1987)
  2. McCafferty v. Solem449 N.W.2d 590 (S.D. 1989)
  3. Vidal v. Sullivan863 F.2d 2 (2d Cir. 1988)

Most recent

  1. McCafferty v. Solem449 N.W.2d 590 (S.D. 1989)
  2. Vidal v. Sullivan863 F.2d 2 (2d Cir. 1988)
  3. United States of America ex rel. Miguel A. Espinoza v. J.W. Fairman, Warden813 F.2d 117 (7th Cir. 1987)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list