Gallentine v. United States
Gallentine v. United States, 474 U.S. 1105 (1986)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(requiring DOE to proceed against over 200 working interest owners and over 2200 royalty interest owners would plunge DOE into an "administrative quagmire")
-
(a case decided while Stripper Well, M.D.L. 378, was pending in which Exxon was found to be liable, in restitution, for overcharge violations exceeding $895 million. Kalodner argued unsuccessfully that this money should not be disbursed entirely to the States)
Cited by 40 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Yuma Petroleum Co. v. Thompson
- Murphy Exploration & Production Company v. Oryx Energy Company
- In re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation. Murfin
- Murfin v. United States Department of Energy
- Crude Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- National Mining Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.