Molt v. United States
Molt v. United States, 475 U.S. 1081 (1986)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(determining whether Guam's laws regarding inspection of imported agricultural products is preempted by the Plant Quarantine Act of 1912)
-
(effective waiver of counsel in the abstract terminates once specific attorney appears on behalf of accused; accused must be informed of availability of counsel and rewaiver of right to counsel must be obtained before interrogation may proceed)
-
("assumption on non-litigated issues are not precedential holdings binding future decisions.’’)
Cited by 52 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.