TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Isaac v. United States

Isaac v. United States, 476 U.S. 1138 (1986)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 27, 1986
Docket
No. 85-5040
Judges
Certiorari, Deny, Writ
Citations
476 U.S. 1138106 S. Ct. 224190 L. Ed. 2d 68954 U.S.L.W. 37771986 U.S. LEXIS 1394

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Henderson v. United States, ante, p. 321.

Justice Stevens would deny the petition for writ of certiorari.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 19 cases

View all citing references →
1986: 11987: 31988: 11990: 41991: 11992: 21996: 12002: 12004: 12006: 12009: 12013: 12015: 119862026peak 1990 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Murray v. United States704 F.3d 23 (1st Cir. 2013)
  2. United States v. McGlory968 F.2d 309 (3d Cir. 1992)
  3. Keehn v. State279 S.W.3d 330 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009)
  4. United States v. James Elkins Carol Elkins, United States of America v. Carol Elkins James Elkins300 F.3d 638 (6th Cir. 2002)
  5. United States v. Schaefer87 F.3d 562 (1st Cir. 1996)
  6. United States v. Solomon Philip Panitz, United States of America v. Andrew Stewart Baumwald907 F.2d 1267 (1st Cir. 1990)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Veloz109 F. Supp. 3d 305 (D. Mass. 2015)
  2. Murray v. United States704 F.3d 23 (1st Cir. 2013)
  3. Keehn v. State279 S.W.3d 330 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009)
  4. Harris v. State948 So. 2d 583 (Ala. Crim. App. 2006)
  5. United States v. Legault323 F. Supp. 2d 217 (D. Mass. 2004)
  6. United States v. James Elkins Carol Elkins, United States of America v. Carol Elkins James Elkins300 F.3d 638 (6th Cir. 2002)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list