Simpson Paper Co. v. California Department of Industrial Relations
Simpson Paper Co. v. California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Occupational Safety and Health
Simpson Paper Co. v. Cal. Dep't of Indus. Relations, 479 U.S. 1033 (1987)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- UA Local 343 of the United Ass'n v. Nor-Cal Plumbing, Inc.
- Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local No. 359, Afl-Cio v. Arizona Mechanical & Stainless, Inc.
- Pipe Trades Council of Northern California, U.A. Local 159, and U.A. Local 393 v. Underground Contractors Association of Northern California
- Local Joint Executive Board Of Las Vegas v. Riverboat Casino, Inc.
- UA Local 343 of the United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry v. Nor-Cal Plumbing, Inc.
- Luden's, Inc. v. Local Union No. 6 of the Bakery, Confectionery & Tobacco Workers International Union
Most recent
- No. 92-15749
- No. 92-15749
- UA Local 343 of the United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry v. Nor-Cal Plumbing, Inc.
- UA Local 343 of the United Ass'n v. Nor-Cal Plumbing, Inc.
- Luden's, Inc. v. Local Union No. 6 of the Bakery, Confectionery & Tobacco Workers International Union
- National Labor Relations Board, Printing Specialties District Council Number 2, as Successor to Printing Specialties District Council Number 1 v. Litton Financial Printing Division, a Division of Litton Business Systems, Inc., Printing Specialties District Council Number 2, as Successor to Printing Specialties District Council Number 1 v. National Labor Relations Board
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.