Diamond Shamrock Corp. v. Zinke & Trumbo

Diamond Shamrock Corp. v. Zinke & Trumbo, 479 U.S. 1035 (1987)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: January 12, 1987
Docket: No. 86-829
Citations: 479 U.S. 1035107 S. Ct. 88793 L. Ed. 2d 84055 U.S.L.W. 34731987 U.S. LEXIS 122

Cited by 9 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(where a licensed importer and police officials conspired to import weapons for private sale trader the auspices of an official police purchase)

Interport, Inc. v. Magaw, 923 F. Supp. 242 (D.D.C. 1996)
(propriety of the ratification process is a political question)

Miller v. United States & Internal Revenue Serv., 868 F.2d 236 (7th Cir. 1989)

Cited by 9 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Roy W. Collins920 F.2d 619 (10th Cir. 1990)
Lowell H. Becraft, Jr. United States of America v. Kenneth W. Nelson885 F.2d 547 (9th Cir. 1989)
Kenneth A. Stoecklin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue865 F.2d 1221 (11th Cir. 1989)
Marvin D. Miller v. United States of America and Internal Revenue Service868 F.2d 236 (7th Cir. 1989)
United States v. George S. Sitka845 F.2d 43 (2d Cir. 1988)
Eric A. Pollard v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service816 F.2d 603 (11th Cir. 1987)

Most recent

Gdowik v. United States (In re Gdowik)228 B.R. 481 (S.D. Fla. 1997)
Interport, Inc. v. Magaw923 F. Supp. 242 (D.D.C. 1996)
United States v. Roy W. Collins920 F.2d 619 (10th Cir. 1990)
Lowell H. Becraft, Jr. United States of America v. Kenneth W. Nelson885 F.2d 547 (9th Cir. 1989)
Kenneth A. Stoecklin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue865 F.2d 1221 (11th Cir. 1989)
Marvin D. Miller v. United States of America and Internal Revenue Service868 F.2d 236 (7th Cir. 1989)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list