Falcon Insurance Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Falcon Ins. Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 479 U.S. 1060 (1987)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: January 20, 1987
Docket: No. 86-818
Judges: Consideration, Took
Citations: 479 U.S. 1060107 S. Ct. 94093 L. Ed. 2d 99055 U.S.L.W. 34941987 U.S. LEXIS 401

Cited by 90 6 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 6 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(weighing competing interests in determining validity of time, place and manner restrictions on speech)

Southcenter Joint Venture v. Nat'l Democratic Policy Comm., 780 P.2d 1282 (Wash. 1989)
(“Indiana ... has a strong additional interest [in the insurance coverage dispute] because it is [the insured’s] principal place of business and place of incorporation.”)

CSX Transp., Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 82 F.3d 478 (D.C. Cir. 1996)
(a corporation is “doing business" under § 1391(c) whenever the Constitution would permit a state to require a foreign corporation to comply with a licensing scheme)

Eason v. Linden Avionics, Inc., 706 F. Supp. 311 (D.N.J. 1989)
(policy ambiguous if reasonable persons may honestly differ as to meaning of policy language)

Prop. Owners Ins. Co. v. Cope, 772 F. Supp. 1096 (N.D. Ind. 1991)
(“[T]he Supremacy Clause, standing alone, secures federal rights only in the sense that it establishes federal-state priorities; it does not create individual rights, nor does it secure such rights within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983.”)

Berg v. Obama, 574 F. Supp. 2d 509 (E.D. Pa. 2008)

Cited by 90 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Ex Parte Tucci859 S.W.2d 1 (Tex. 1993)
State v. Reece757 P.2d 947 (Wash. 1988)
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.533 N.W.2d 25 (Minn. 1995)
Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance, Ltd. v. English China Clays, P.L.C.815 S.W.2d 223 (Tex. 1991)
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Summit Corp. of America715 N.E.2d 926 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999)
Meridian Mutual Insurance v. Auto-Owners Insurance698 N.E.2d 770 (Ind. 1998)

Most recent

Kelsey Ann Nunley, V. Richard NunleyNo. 84039-8 (Wash. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2023)
Walter Bishop v. Shirley BaubitsNo. 53142-9 (Wash. Ct. App. Mar. 9, 2021)
In re The Gordon & Frances Sales Family TrustNo. 52630-1 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 10, 2020)
Todd Enright v. Asclepius Panacea, LLC Asclepius Panacea GP, LLC Daily Pharmacy, LLC Daily Pharmacy GP, LLC And Toth Enterprises II, P .A. D/B/A Victory Medical CenterNo. 03-15-00348-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 24, 2015)
Teel v. STADING228 P.3d 1293 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010)
In re Marriage of Meredith201 P.3d 1056 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list