Williams v. Ohio
Williams v. Ohio Bradley v. Alabama
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Sup. Ct. Ohio; and
Sup. Ct. Ala. Certio-rari denied.
Dissent
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Justice Brennan,
dissenting.
Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.
Dissent
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Justice White,
with whom Justice Brennan joins, dissenting in No. 86-5307.
In this case, the Ohio Supreme Court rejected petitioner’s claim that a statutory aggravating factor that repeats an element of the crime is unconstitutional because it fails to narrow the class of persons eligible for the death penalty. This decision is consistent with Wingo v. Blackburn, 783 F. 2d 1046, 1051 (CA5 1986), cert. pending, No. 86-5026, but in conflict with Collins v. Lockhart, 754 F. 2d 258, 263-264 (CA8), cert. denied, 474 U. S. 1013 (1985). I would grant certiorari to resolve this conflict.
Dissent
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
In these cases, petitioners’ death sentences were founded on statutory aggravating factors that repeat elements of the underlying capital offenses. For reasons stated in Wiley v. Mississippi, 479 U. S. 906 (1986) (Marshall, J., dissenting from denial of cer-tiorari), I would grant the petitions for review.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(Brennan, Marshall, White, J.J., dissenting)
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.