County of Madison v. Warren
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a case tried and determined by the court without the intervention of a jury. The record does not show any stipulation in writing waiving a jury. The errors assigned all relate to. rulings of the court on the trial, excepted to at the time, and presented by a bill of exceptions. The rule is well settled, •that if a written stipulation waiving a jury is not in some way *623 shown affirmatively in the record, none of the questions decided at the trial can be re-examined here on writ of error.
Kearney v. Case, 12 Wall. 275 ;
Gilman v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co., 91 U. S. 603 ;
Boogher v. New York Life Insurance Co., 103 id. 90;
Hodges v. Easton, ante, p. 408.
For this reason, and without passing on any of the questions presented by the assignment of errors, the judgment is ' Affirmed.
Note.— County of Alexander v. Kimball, error to the same court as the preceding case, was submitted by Mr. William B. Gilbert for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. T. C. Mather for the defendant in error. It involved the .precise question decided in that case, and a judgment to the same effect was rendered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 18 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.