TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. United States District Court

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon (John Stribling Ford, Inc., Real Party in Interest)

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. United States Dist. Court, 484 U.S. 1041 (1988)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 25, 1988
Docket
No. 87-31
Citations
484 U.S. 1041108 S. Ct. 77298 L. Ed. 2d 85856 U.S.L.W. 35001988 U.S. LEXIS 478
Cited by 8 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (“We need not decide now whether an unconditional agreement for prospective employment gives rise to a protectable property right (all the cases cited by appellants concern the right to continued employment)”)
    Petru v. City of Berwyn, 872 F.2d 1359 (7th Cir. 1989)

Cited by 8 cases

View all citing references →
1988: 21989: 21995: 21996: 219882026peak 1988 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stewart v. Rubin948 F. Supp. 1077 (D.D.C. 1996)
  2. Donald Petru v. City of Berwyn872 F.2d 1359 (7th Cir. 1989)
  3. Farmland Dairies v. Commissioner Of The New York State Department Of Agriculture And Markets847 F.2d 1038 (2d Cir. 1988)
  4. Berger, Shapiro & Davis, P.A. v. Haeling (In re Foos)183 B.R. 149 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1995)
  5. In re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation864 F.2d 796 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1988)
  6. People Who Care v. Rockford Board Of Education68 F.3d 172 (7th Cir. 1995)

Most recent

  1. Stewart v. Rubin948 F. Supp. 1077 (D.D.C. 1996)
  2. Home Savings of America, FSB v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Co.169 F.R.D. 332 (N.D. Ill. 1996)
  3. People Who Care v. Rockford Board Of Education68 F.3d 172 (7th Cir. 1995)
  4. Berger, Shapiro & Davis, P.A. v. Haeling (In re Foos)183 B.R. 149 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1995)
  5. Donald Petru v. City of Berwyn872 F.2d 1359 (7th Cir. 1989)
  6. Mrs. W. v. Tirozzi124 F.R.D. 42 (D. Conn. 1989)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list