Taylor v. Henry Vogt Machine Co.
Taylor v. Henry Vogt Mach. Co., 484 U.S. 1046 (1988)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“in the context of an assignment of a patent, they can agree verbally until the cows come home, and that patent isn’t assigned until there’s a writing”)
-
(defendants established limited partnerships to purchase patents at inflated prices and sold partnership shares to investors representing that portion of partnership losses would be deductible; no first amendment protection)
-
(failure of district court to affirma tively state reasons for enhanced sentence required appellate court to vacate the sentence and remand for new sentencing)
-
(defendant helped create and manage illegal tax shelters)
Cited by 25 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- United States v. Green
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9376, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,355 United States of America v. Anthony C
- United States v. Sarno
- United States v. Leonid Vgeri, United States of America v. Ervin Stramarko
- Valmet Paper MacHinery, Inc. v. Beloit Corp.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.