Molina v. United States
Molina v. United States Crowley Maritime Corp. v. Zipfel Halliburton Co. v. Zipfel In re Sowell Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago Morris v. Compagnie Maritime des Chargeurs Reunis, S. A. Fitzgerald v. Montana Department of Family Services Bell, Individually and dba Wes Outdoor Advertising Co. v. New Jersey Rose v. Texas Hyslep et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Roberts v. Roberts Fisher v. Oklahoma Kyles v. Louisiana Gardner v. North Carolina Knox v. Texas Levert v. Estelle, Warden Miranda v. California May v. Pro-Guard, Inc. Williams v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America Trotz, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Trotz v. Lawruk, t/a Penn Alto Hotel Spencer v. Illinois Trotz v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review Foster v. Illinois Waters v. Neubert Johnson v. Illinois McGee v. Randall Division of Textron, Inc., of Grenada, Mississippi Flores v. Municipality of Carolina
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
*1245 ante, p. 1214;
ante, p. 1201;
*1246 No. 87-1694. No. 87-1820. No. 87-5425. No. 87-6008. No. 87-6096. No. 87-6196. No. 87-6365. No. 87-6486. No. 87-6746. No. 87-6816. No. 87-6817. No. 87-6863. No. 87-6864. No. 87-6875. No. 87-6905. No. 87-6912. No. 87-6926. No. 87-6959. No. 87-7017.
486 U.. S. 1061;
ante, p. 1207;
ante, p. 1220;
ante, p. 1208;
ante, p. 1208;
ante, p. 1209;
ante, p. 1209; and ante, p. 1239. Petitions for rehearing denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(stating that States 3 or governmental entities that are considered “arms of the State’ for Eleventh Amendment purposes are 4 not “persons” under § 1983)
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.