Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit v. Lovinger
Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit, Lake County, Illinois v. Lovinger
Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit v. Lovinger, 488 U.S. 851 (1988)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that, in a case in which the sheriff was not personally involved in the acts causing the constitutional deprivation, the plaintiff must show some other act by the sheriff that caused the violation)
-
(no probable cause exists where minimal further investigation would have reduced any suspicion created by the facts the police had discovered)
-
(wherein the appellant's inculpatory statement was involuntary because the arresting officer gave the promise or hope of favorable treatment by telling the appellant that he would speak to the district attorney in his behalf)
Cited by 39 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Camden v. Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit
- Camden v. Circuit Court
- Hicks v. Bexar County, Tex.
- United States v. Ruben Rocha, Thomas Padilla, Hector Garcia-Garcia, Johnny Robert Hinojosa, and Jose Santos Gallegos
- Karla Kaye Kuehl v. Stephen P. Burtis Terry Satterlee Other John Doe City of Sioux Falls Ezekial James McBeth
- Glenn Johnson v. D. Rook Moore, III
Most recent
- Hunter v. Etowah Cnty. Court Referral Program, LLC
- County of El Paso v. Dorado
- the County of El Paso v. Jessie Dorado, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of Brianna Alexis Miranda, a Minor and on Behalf of the Estate of Eduardo Miranda
- the County of El Paso v. Jessie Dorado, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of Brianna Alexis Miranda, a Minor and on Behalf of the Estate of Eduardo Miranda
- Gliatta v. Jones
- Commonwealth v. Kelly
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.