Rowe v. Allied Chemical Hourly Employees' Pension Plan
Rowe v. Allied Chem. Hourly Employees' Pension Plan, 489 U.S. 1049 (1989)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, ante, p. 101.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 8 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(stating that plaintiff did not meet burden when it pled in very general terms, and did not allege who made or received fraudulent statements)
-
(permitting amendment of RICO complaint which failed to plead predicate acts of mail and wire fraud with sufficient particularity under Rule 9(b))
-
(blanket allegation of mail and wire fraud in RICO case, without indicating who made or received fraudulent representation, is insufficient under Rule 9(b))
-
(complaint dismissed where it alleged “the general content of the representations,” but did not specify “who the speakers were ... or who received the information ... ”)
-
(multiple inducements to retire made to thirty-two retirees over roughly six months)
-
(vacated for reconsideration in light of Supreme Court’s decision in Firestone)
-
(Rule 9(b) requires “detailed allegations” of fraud)
Cited by 60 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Christopher v. Mobil Oil Corp.
- Insurance Consultants of America, Inc., Employee Pension Plan v. Southeastern Insurance Group
- 57 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1280, 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,235, 14 Employee Benefits Cas. 2492 Gerald W. Christopher, Charles L. Prunty, and Billy G. Turner v. Mobil Oil Corporation, Retirement Plan of Mobil Oil Corporation and Rex Adams
- Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
- Jose Rolo v. City Investing Company Liquidating Trust
- Rolo v. City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.