Grimaldo v. United States

Grimaldo v. United States, 493 U.S. 841 (1989)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 2, 1989
Docket: No. 88-7553
Citations: 493 U.S. 841110 S. Ct. 128107 L. Ed. 2d 8858 U.S.L.W. 32151989 U.S. LEXIS 4151

Cited by 51 7 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 7 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(implying that Federal Evidence Rule 601 precludes any examination of witness competency by the court, although competence may be reviewed under other evidence rules such as Federal Evidence Rule 403 and 603)

Newsome v. State, 686 N.E.2d 868 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997)
(the Sentencing Guidelines allow the consideration of relevant conduct for which the defendant was not convicted in determining the actual guideline range)

United States v. Trujillo, 906 F.2d 1456 (10th Cir. 1990)
(considering right only to impartial jury, not due process claim)

State v. DiFrisco, 645 A.2d 734 (N.J. 1994)

Cited by 51 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Rodney Byrd898 F.2d 450 (5th Cir. 1990)
United States v. Thomas932 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir. 1991)
United States v. Winston Gary Thomas, United States of America v932 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir. 1991)
State v. DiFrisco645 A.2d 734 (N.J. 1994)
United States v. Timothy Wayne Morrow (89-5418/5708) and George Mooneyham (89-5710)977 F.2d 222 (6th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Vital68 F.3d 114 (5th Cir. 1995)

Most recent

United States v. Roy Cobb432 F. App'x 578 (6th Cir. 2011)
United States v. Honken378 F. Supp. 2d 970 (N.D. Iowa 2004)
Parker v. Housing Authority742 A.2d 522 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1999)
Newsome v. State686 N.E.2d 868 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997)
State v. Morant701 A.2d 1 (Conn. 1997)
State v. Eldred1997 ND 112, 564 N.W.2d 283

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list