Burrell v. City of Los Angeles
Burrell v. City of Los Angeles, 493 U.S. 1043 (1990)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(failed attempt to offset subordinated capital debentures of insolvent bank against recovery sought by FDIC on behalf of insolvent bank)
-
("Appellants have made no effort to provide us with a statement envisioned by Fed.R.App.P. 10(c), and it is the responsibility of counsel ... to insure that a complete record is available for our review”)
-
(setoff inappropriate where debentures not mutually extinguishable with notes “because the debentures were specifically made subordinate to the claims of all other depositors and creditors of the bank”)
-
(no setoff against claim by FDIC where writing requirement was not met)
-
("A conspiracy to rig bids may be an agreement among competitors about ... who should be the successful bidder ... or who should refrain from bidding ... that affects, limits, or avoids competition among them.")
Cited by 74 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.