Royal Crown Cola Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.

Royal Crown Cola Co. v. Coca-Cola Co., 497 U.S. 1011 (1990)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: June 25, 1990
Docket: No. 89-1756
Citations: 497 U.S. 1011110 S. Ct. 3258111 L. Ed. 2d 76758 U.S.L.W. 38181990 U.S. LEXIS 3381

Cited by 79 4 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(attorney’s failure'correctly to inform client about parole eligibility can amount to constitutional violation if it directly affects decision to plead guilty)

Rogers v. United States, 1 F.3d 697 (8th Cir. 1993)
(evidence was not “obtained in violation” of Illinois law within meaning of Illinois exclusionary provision where evidence was validly intercepted in Maryland, even though interception would have been invalid if accomplished in Illinois)

Mustafa v. State, 591 A.2d 481 (Md. 1991)
(erroneous parole advice may constitute ineffective assistance of counsel)

Hawkins v. Murray, 798 F. Supp. 330 (E.D. Va. 1992)

Cited by 79 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Bruce E. Holloway v. United States960 F.2d 1348 (8th Cir. 1992)
Gerald Freeman v. Michael P. Lane962 F.2d 1252 (7th Cir. 1992)
Bouwkamp v. State833 P.2d 486 (Wyo. 1992)
Cook v. State841 P.2d 1345 (Wyo. 1992)
Bivins v. State642 N.E.2d 928 (Ind. 1995)
People v. Barrow749 N.E.2d 892 (Ill. 2001)

Most recent

State v. Rice2021 Ohio 4172
State v. Morton2021 Ohio 3468
State v. Lee2021 Ohio 2925
State v. Williams2020 Ohio 378
State v. Mitchell2019 Ohio 4256
State v. Martemus2019 Ohio 1116

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list