Janneh v. GAF Corp.
Janneh v. GAF Corp., 498 U.S. 865 (1990)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(judgment by stipulation was held to be conclusive if the parties have entered an agreement manifesting such intention)
-
(Doyle is intended to prohibit a prosecutor from exploiting a defendant's post-arrest silence)
-
(where, in reviewing a federal statute similar to LSA-R.S. 14:95.1, which prohibited possession of a firearm by a felon, the court found irrelevant whether or not the rifle possessed by the defendant was inoperable since “[a]n inoperable firearm is nonetheless a firearm.”)
Cited by 44 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals29
- Federal District Courts10
- Bankruptcy Courts2
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts2
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Desktop Direct, Inc., a Utah Corporation v. Digital Equipment Corporation, a Massachusetts Corporation
- Christopher Eric Gravley v. David Mills, Warden, Morgan County Regional Correctional Facility
- United States v. Leonard Joseph Yannott
- Bullion Reserve of North America, a California Corporation, Debtor. Curtis B. Danning, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Michael L. Miller
- United States v. Gilberto Pineda-Ortuno and Carlos Ramirez-Carranza
- SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., a California Corporation v. Michael S. FISHER and Meryle Fisher
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.