Santiago v. United States

Santiago v. United States, 498 U.S. 867 (1990)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 1, 1990
Docket: No. 90-5232
Citations: 498 U.S. 867111 S. Ct. 182112 L. Ed. 2d 14559 U.S.L.W. 32491990 U.S. LEXIS 4792

Cited by 74 4 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(affirming § 875(c) conviction for a threat against people at a post office made to an Assistant United States Attorney)

United States v. Baker, 890 F. Supp. 1375 (E.D. Mich. 1995)
("[D]ue process extends the right to be free from the infliction of unnecessary harm to children in state-regulated foster homes.")

Lee v. Gelineau, 93-3466 (2001), Nos. 93-3466, C.A. No. 93-3468 (Sup. Ct. R.I. Oct. 9, 2001)

Cited by 74 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Cindy L. Cameron and Lawrence M. Cameron v. James McCauley Seitz, Monroe County Probate Court38 F.3d 264 (6th Cir. 1994)
Marisol A. by Next Friend Forbes v. Giuliani929 F. Supp. 662 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
United States v. Abraham Jacob Alkhabaz, Also Known as Jake Baker104 F.3d 1492 (6th Cir. 1997)
"Tony" L. ex rel. Simpson v. Childers71 F.3d 1182 (6th Cir. 1995)
Krajicek v. Justin991 F. Supp. 875 (E.D. Mich. 1998)
Coker on Behalf of Coker v. Henry813 F. Supp. 567 (W.D. Mich. 1993)

Most recent

Hanas v. Seterus, Inc.92 F. Supp. 3d 747 (E.D. Tenn. 2015)
Hensley Manufacturing, Inc. v. Propride, Inc.622 F. Supp. 2d 554 (E.D. Mich. 2008)
Tolliver v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.506 F. Supp. 2d 260 (S.D. Ohio 2007)
Total Benefits Planning Agency Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield630 F. Supp. 2d 842 (S.D. Ohio 2007)
Roberson v. Medtronic, Inc.494 F. Supp. 2d 864 (W.D. Tenn. 2007)
Carr v. Home Tech Co., Inc.476 F. Supp. 2d 859 (W.D. Tenn. 2007)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list