Laroque v. Qantas Airways, Ltd.

Laroque v. Qantas Airways, Ltd., 498 U.S. 867 (1990)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 1, 1990
Docket: No. 90-5242
Citations: 498 U.S. 867111 S. Ct. 183112 L. Ed. 2d 14659 U.S.L.W. 32491990 U.S. LEXIS 4576

Cited by 14 4 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(holding that there was no speedy trial violation where, among other things, defense counsel agreed to delays and continuances for purposes of plea negotiations)

Murphy v. State, 280 S.W.3d 445 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009)
(provisions of the Speedy Trial Act embody a reasonableness standard for exclusion of time only when Congress explicitly required the period of delay to be reasonable)

United States v. Upton, 921 F. Supp. 100 (E.D.N.Y. 1995)
(speedy trial clock begins on day after indictment or arraignment)

United States v. Kelly, 45 F.3d 45 (2d Cir. 1995)

Cited by 14 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

State v. Munoz991 S.W.2d 818 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999)
Richard K. Wells, K-2894 v. George Petsock, Superintendent941 F.2d 253 (3d Cir. 1991)
United States v. Frank James Occhipinti, Jr., Austin Michael Suttles, Timothy James Spence, Tina Marie Swab998 F.2d 791 (10th Cir. 1993)
United States v. Scott David Lattany982 F.2d 866 (3d Cir. 1993)
United States v. David Williams372 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2004)
United States v. Robert Thomas Johnson, Richard Lee Niedfeldt, and David Lynn Johnson12 F.3d 1540 (10th Cir. 1993)

Most recent

Patrice Murphy v. State280 S.W.3d 445 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009)
United States v. David Williams372 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2004)
United States v. Oberoi295 F. Supp. 2d 286 (W.D.N.Y. 2003)
State v. Munoz991 S.W.2d 818 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999)
United States v. Cruz907 F. Supp. 87 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)
United States v. Upton921 F. Supp. 100 (E.D.N.Y. 1995)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list