New York Telephone Co. v. Cahill
N.Y. Tel. Co. v. Cahill, 498 U.S. 939 (1990)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(invalidating, on First Amendment grounds, state commission's policy allowing utilities to recover from ratepayers, as operating expenses, charitable contributions to politically and religiously active organizations)
-
(plaintiff must show protected activity, adverse employment decision, and causal link between the two)
-
(specifically rejecting a reasonableness or balancing test)
-
(interpreting federal law; used by analogy)
Cited by 27 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- 71 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 584, 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,170, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5069, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8191 Robert T. Ortez, Sr. v. Washington County, State of Oregon John Junkin, County Attorney Michelle Barrerr, County Attorney Charles Cameron, County Administrator and Susan Wilson, County Supervisor
- Hennessey v. Coastal Eagle Point Oil Co.
- Ortez v. Washington County
- Gary E. Wallis, Husband Carol Wallis, Wife v. J.R. Simplot Company
- Angela Schlacter-Jones v. General Telephone of California Patricia Leathers Carol Todd Doug Bartrip
- Robert Landon v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.