Del Rosario v. United States
Rosario v. United States, 498 U.S. 942 (1990)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 11 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(listing ineligibility for parole, loss of good time, and loss of rights of citizenship as collateral consequences of a guilty plea)
-
(holding deportation to be a collateral consequence of a guilty plea, and listing loss of civil service employment, the right to vote and to travel freely abroad, the right to a driver’s license, and the right to possess firearms as other examples of potential collateral consequences)
-
(“The possibility of being deported can be — and frequently is — the most important factor in a criminal defendant’s decision how to plead”)
-
("This case opens the window on the sometimes bizarre and topsy-turvy world of sentencing under the Guidelines.")
-
(district court mistakenly imposed a sentence different from the one to which the parties had agreed and where the judge had intended to abide by the agreement)
-
(amended Rule 35 does not repudiate authority of district court to correct illegal sentence)
-
(defendant not entitled to § 5K2.12 departure because her motivation was money)
Cited by 106 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.