Stewart v. Morris
Stewart v. Morris, 498 U.S. 958 (1990)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(affirming summary judgment for employer despite showing that terminated employee excelled in core skill of underwriting)
-
(preemption of claims of infliction of emotional distress, wrongful termination, breach of contract, and defamation)
-
(“The mere fact that plaintiff failed to file a timely opposition does not mean that defendant’s Rule 56 motion should be granted”)
-
(emotional distress and defamation claims preempted by RLA)
Cited by 71 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Judson C. Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation Quaker State Corporation
- Santiago v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Credito de Arecibo (In re Santiago)
- Armbruster v. Unisys Corp.
- Desmond v. Varrasso (In re Varrasso)
- Victor Lopez v. Corporacion Azucarera De Puerto Rico
- Gabriel TORRE v. CASIO, INC.
Most recent
- Jaime Leopoldo Vazquez Bernier and Carmen Mercedes Pagan Ortiz v. Treasury Department of Puerto Rico
- Instituto Medico del Norte, Inc. v. Condado 7, LLC
- In re Diana Josefina Padilla Ibanez
- Puntas Associates LLC v. Carlos M. Muñiz Ruiz, Edna O. Muñiz Ruiz and Adaliz Muñiz Aviles
- Instituto Medico del Norte, Inc. v. Condado 7, LLC
- Victor Alejandro Troche v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)s.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.