TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Golub

In re Golub, 498 U.S. 965 (1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
November 13, 1990
Docket
No. 90-5759
Judges
Blackmun, Marshall, Stevens
Citations
498 U.S. 965111 S. Ct. 426

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma 'pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 4, 1990, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Dissent — Marshallblackmunstevens

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Stevens,

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for writ of mandamus without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Theodis Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U.S. 928 (1983) 289

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list