Yates v. Memphis Bakery Employers Ass'n
Yates v. Memphis Bakery Employers Assn.
Yates v. Memphis Bakery Employers Ass'n, 498 U.S. 986 (1990)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 6 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(equating a "true threat" with a situation "where a reasonable person would foresee that the listener will believe he will be subjected to physical violence upon his person....")
-
(evidence of drug transactions occurring within one hour of each other held admissible to explain entire plan or conspiracy to distribute cocaine)
-
(no interplay between Bounds and Faretta that would require a trial court to permit a pro se defendant to have access to a law library)
-
(upholding conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 876, mailing threatening communications)
-
(traveling with companion is characteristic)
Cited by 36 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.