Albers v. United States

Albers v. United States, 498 U.S. 991 (1990)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: November 26, 1990
Docket: No. 90-6088
Citations: 498 U.S. 991111 S. Ct. 535112 L. Ed. 2d 54559 U.S.L.W. 33921990 U.S. LEXIS 5952

Cited by 66 3 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(taking photographs is a seizure of an intangible similar to tapping a telephone line in that they are both seizures of information)

Ayeni ex rel. Ayeni v. CBS Inc., 848 F. Supp. 362 (E.D.N.Y. 1994)
(“vague and general assertion [of antagonistic defenses] is entirely insufficient to show the kind of substantial prejudice that warrants a new trial for denial of severance”)

State v. Booth, 737 A.2d 404 (Conn. 1999)
(joint trial was not prejudicial because the evidence for each count was non-inflammatoiy)

United States v. Stein, 428 F. Supp. 2d 138 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

Cited by 66 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Kulvinder Jaswal, Yousef Rouhani and Mohammad Shahnavazy47 F.3d 539 (2d Cir. 1995)
United States v. Doris Lasanta, Luis Rivera, Juan Cardona, and Eladio Gonzalez978 F.2d 1300 (2d Cir. 1992)
United States v. Talbot22 F. Supp. 3d 419 (M.D. Penn. 2014)
United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, and Armando Velasquez11 F.3d 315 (2d Cir. 1993)
United States v. William Rea, Getty Terminals Corp., and John Pabone, Getty Terminals Corp., William Rea, John Pabone, and John Quock958 F.2d 1206 (2d Cir. 1992)
United States v. Lorenzo Nichols, Howard Mason56 F.3d 403 (2d Cir. 1995)

Most recent

United States v. Talbot22 F. Supp. 3d 419 (M.D. Penn. 2014)
United States v. Stewart485 F.3d 666 (2d Cir. 2007)
United States v. Pierce493 F. Supp. 2d 611 (W.D.N.Y. 2006)
Qualley v. State206 S.W.3d 624 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)
United States v. Stein428 F. Supp. 2d 138 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)
United States v. Mullen243 F.R.D. 54 (W.D.N.Y. 2006)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list