McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc.
McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc., 498 U.S. 992 (1990)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(readministering Miranda warnings was insufficient to clarify when detective made negative comments designed to persuade suspect to keep talking)
-
(drawing distinction between procedural challenges to agency action, which must be brought within statutory review period or be forever barred, and substantive challenges, which are not subject to such a restriction)
-
(“the scope of fraud under these [federal fraud] statutes is broader than common law fraud, and ... no misrepresentation of fact is required”)
-
(alleged kickbacks in violation of federal law were not deceptive because they did not induce plaintiff to give, up its exclusive dealership)
-
(breach of contract does not constitute a scheme to defraud)
Cited by 56 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals27
- Federal District Courts19
- Bankruptcy Courts2
- Military Courts2
- State Highest Courts3
- State Appellate Courts3
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.