Peterson v. Department of the Interior
Peterson v. Dep't of the Interior, 498 U.S. 1003 (1990)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice White and Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(the officer “point blank asked [the defendant] if [he] was armed. [The defendant], instead of responding either affirmatively or negatively, simply remained silent.”)
-
("Congress was particularly concerned that the reclamation projects not fuel land speculation in the West or contribute in any way to the monopolization of land in the hands of a few private individuals.”)
Cited by 49 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United States
- Westlands Water District San Benito Water District v. United States of America Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of Interior Kirk C. Rodgers, Acting Regional Director Gale A. Norton, Secretary of the Interior, San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Water Authority Friant Power Authority Friant Water Users Authority Chowchilla Water District Madera Irrigation v. Roger K. Patterson, Regional Director of Mid Pacific Region Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior Lester Snow, Acting Regional Director
- Westlands Water District v. United States
- United States v. Coleman
- United States v. Harris
- Brewer v. Marshall
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.