TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Arcadia v. Ohio Power Co.

Arcadia, Ohio v. Ohio Power Co. Perry v. Louisiana Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs Cook v. United States Green v. Law Firm of Wiseman, Blackburn, Futrell & Cohen

Arcadia v. Ohio Power Co., 498 U.S. 1075 (1991)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 22, 1991
Docket
Nos. 89-1283; No. 89-5120; No. 89-5867; No. 89-7584; No. 89-7822
Judges
Consideration, Petitions, Took
Citations
498 U.S. 1075111 S. Ct. 804112 L. Ed. 2d 86559 U.S.L.W. 35021991 U.S. LEXIS 525

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ante, p. 73;

ante, p. 38;

ante, p. 89;

ante, p. 832; and ante, p. 842. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 30 cases

View all citing references →
1991: 21992: 61993: 31994: 21995: 31996: 51997: 11998: 11999: 12000: 32006: 22008: 119912026peak 1992 · 6

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Perry610 So. 2d 746 (La. 1992)
  2. Autrey v. Potlatch Corp.800 F. Supp. 872 (N.D. Cal. 1992)
  3. Jacinto S. Pinat v. Office of Personnel Management931 F.2d 1544 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
  4. Harold E. Bailey v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans Affairs160 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
  5. Keenan v. Allan889 F. Supp. 1320 (E.D. Wash. 1995)
  6. Thompson v. Brown8 Vet. App. 169 (Vet. App. 1995)

Most recent

  1. Lockwood v. United States90 Fed. Cl. 210 (Fed. Cl. 2008)
  2. Dachman v. United States73 Fed. Cl. 508 (Fed. Cl. 2006)
  3. Wiley v. United States69 Fed. Cl. 733 (Fed. Cl. 2006)
  4. Lee v. Gober14 Vet. App. 204 (Vet. App. 2000)
  5. Osborn v. United States47 Fed. Cl. 224 (Fed. Cl. 2000)
  6. United States v. Marsh89 F. Supp. 2d 1171 (D. Haw. 2000)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list