Holliday v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Holliday v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
Holliday v. Consol. Rail Corp., 498 U.S. 1090 (1991)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 6 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(injury including manifestation of psychological symptoms found not to be solely emotional based upon accompanying heart palpitations, spastic colon, tenesmus, and involuntary rectal discharge)
-
(“[If] a railroad employee demonstrating some possible negligence with psychological consequences will always present a jury question in a FELA action, the most attenuated claims could be advanced.”)
-
(work-related stress did not constitute injury under the FELA)
-
(relatives with drug problems sufficient race neutral reason)
Cited by 66 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- United States v. Edward Moore, Also Known as Andrew Moore, Also Known as Mo
- United States v. Winfred Thomas
- United States v. Durrell Kaye Jackson, United States of America v. Dentonious Neville Washington, Also Known as Neal, Also Known as Neil, Also Known as Buck Mouth, United States of America v. Arthur Mabry, Also Known as Oscar
- Butler v. the Burlington Northern
- United States v. Durrell Jackson
- United States v. James L. Waller
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.