Moreno v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration
Moreno v. United States Drug Enforcement Admin., 498 U.S. 1091 (1991)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that, because statutory wording mandatory, court could not excuse failure to file information even though defendant agreed prior to trial that enhanced penalty applied)
-
(where § 851(e) bars challenge to prior conviction, failure to comply with warning requirement of § 851(b) does not require remand)
-
(‘We find nothing unconstitutional in Congress’ allocation of the burdens of proof in forfeiture eases.”)
-
(service timely because made “prior to the selection of the trial jury”)
-
(Detail and specificity of [DEA agent’s] affidavit establishing probable cause, viewed in the light of [claimant’s] express declination to present evidence challenging the Government’s evidence of probable cause, warranted grant of summary judgment in favor of Government)
Cited by 61 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- United States v. All Funds on Deposit in Any Accounts Maintained at Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
- United States v. Leasehold Interest in 121 Nostrand Avenue
- Diane Lovejoy-Wilson v. Noco Motor Fuel, Inc.
- United States of America v. Rene Gonzalez-Lerma
- United States v. James Robert Rice
- United States v. Property Identified as 908 T Street, NW
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.