TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. Louis v. Jordan

Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. Louis, Inc. v. Jordan

Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. Louis v. Jordan, 499 U.S. 914 (1991)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 18, 1991
Docket
No. 88-1483
Citations
499 U.S. 914111 S. Ct. 1298113 L. Ed. 2d 23359 U.S.L.W. 36351991 U.S. LEXIS 1665

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Haslip, ante, p. 1.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1991: 41992: 21994: 12000: 12002: 12003: 12004: 12011: 12019: 119912026peak 1991 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Robertson Oil Company, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Company930 F.2d 1342 (8th Cir. 1991)
  2. Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.596 A.2d 687 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1991)
  3. Patricia Stephenson Eichenseer v. Reserve Life Insurance Company934 F.2d 1377 (5th Cir. 1991)
  4. Sobley v. Southern Natural Gas Co.302 F.3d 325 (5th Cir. 2002)
  5. United States v. Bertoli854 F. Supp. 975 (D.N.J. 1994)
  6. Sobley v. Southern Natural Gas Co.210 F.3d 561 (5th Cir. 2000)

Most recent

  1. Hayes v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance CompanyNo. 3:17-cv-00750 (S.D. Miss. July 10, 2019)
  2. Mitchell v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.799 F. Supp. 2d 680 (N.D. Miss. 2011)
  3. Tipton v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance381 F. Supp. 2d 572 (S.D. Miss. 2004)
  4. Owen v. Universal Underwriters Insurance252 F. Supp. 2d 324 (S.D. Miss. 2003)
  5. Sobley v. Southern Natural Gas Co.302 F.3d 325 (5th Cir. 2002)
  6. Sobley v. Southern Natural Gas Co.210 F.3d 561 (5th Cir. 2000)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list