United Ass'n of Black Landscapers v. City of Milwaukee
United Association of Black Landscapers v. City of Milwaukee
United Ass'n of Black Landscapers v. City of Milwaukee, 499 U.S. 923 (1991)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 7th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that school districts do not share in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity, because they are not alter egos of the Commonwealth)
-
(accountant’s receipt of substantial fees for its services “not sufficient to support an inference of scienter”)
-
(court held that assertions that the defendant had knowledge of the misstatements “are nothing more than rote conclusions”)
-
(exhaustion appropriate where issues involved were purely legal, not factual)
Cited by 71 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Carlisle Area School v. Scott P., by and Through His Guardians, Bess P
- M.C. And G.C., on Behalf of Their Son, J.C. v. Central Regional School District, M.C
- Carlisle Area School v. Scott P. ex rel. Bess P.
- M.C. v. Central Regional School District
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,266 Irene L. Wright, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young LLP
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.