Stratton v. United States

Stratton v. United States, 499 U.S. 924 (1991)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: March 18, 1991
Docket: No. 90-6624
Citations: 499 U.S. 924111 S. Ct. 1320113 L. Ed. 2d 25359 U.S.L.W. 36361991 U.S. LEXIS 1490

Cited by 25 3 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(court may consider defendant’s. choice to go to trial as factor in determining whether defendant accepted responsibility)

United States v. Dempsey, 957 F.2d 831 (11th Cir. 1992)
("The general rule in this circuit is that defendants who are jointly indicted should be tried together, and this rule has been held to be particularly applicable to conspiracy cases.")

United States v. Knowles, 66 F.3d 1146 (11th Cir. 1995)

Cited by 25 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Juan Delgado, Emilio Albelo, Juan Carlos Riverol, Tomas Raul Hernandez56 F.3d 1357 (11th Cir. 1995)
UNITED STATES of America v. John E. CALHOON97 F.3d 518 (11th Cir. 1996)
United States v. Knowles66 F.3d 1146 (11th Cir. 1995)
United States v. Noble C. Beasley, Andre Bruce White, Stephanie Nodd, Richard Stanberry2 F.3d 1551 (11th Cir. 1993)
United States v. Robert C. Jacoby and Thomas Skubal955 F.2d 1527 (11th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Tiffany M. Billops and James A. Morning43 F.3d 281 (7th Cir. 1994)

Most recent

Owens v. State916 N.E.2d 913 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009)
United States v. Monroe Evans, Also Known as Ty, Also Known as Daddy314 F.3d 329 (8th Cir. 2003)
United States v. Patterson213 F. Supp. 2d 900 (N.D. Ill. 2002)
United States v. Tolliver954 F. Supp. 164 (N.D. Ill. 1996)
United States v. CalhoonNo. 95-8171 (11th Cir. Oct. 16, 1996)
UNITED STATES of America v. John E. CALHOON97 F.3d 518 (11th Cir. 1996)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list