National Rifle Ass'n v. Brady

National Rifle Assn. v. Brady, Secretary of Treasury

Nat'l Rifle Ass'n v. Brady, 499 U.S. 959 (1991)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: April 15, 1991
Docket: No. 90-1068
Citations: 499 U.S. 959113 L. Ed. 2d 645

Cited by 32 3 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(finding abuse-of-discretion review proper where sanctions imposed pursuant to four theories)

Kujawa v. Kujawa, 270 F.3d 578 (8th Cir. 2001)
(allowing each side a total block of hours for direct and cross-examination)

Enright v. Auto-Owners Ins., 2 F. Supp. 2d 1072 (N.D. Ind. 1998)
(applying Chevron to the Gun Control Act, 18 U.S.C. § 923(d)(1)(E)(i))

Cal. Cosmetology Coal. v. Riley, 871 F. Supp. 1263 (C.D. Cal. 1994)

Cited by 32 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Thompson v. City of Clio765 F. Supp. 1066 (M.D. Ala. 1991)
Brubaker v. City of Richmond943 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1991)
Neal v. Miller778 F. Supp. 378 (W.D. Mich. 1991)
Colbert v. Yadkin Valley Telephone Membership Corp.960 F. Supp. 84 (M.D.N.C. 1997)
Paul Carter v. William L. Ball, III33 F.3d 450 (4th Cir. 1994)
William J. Elliott v. William Thomas, Barbara Propst v. Morton W. Weir937 F.2d 338 (7th Cir. 1991)

Most recent

ARMALINE, INC. v. Lambert512 F. Supp. 2d 1070 (N.D. Ohio 2007)
Safe-Strap Co., Inc. v. Koala Corp.270 F. Supp. 2d 407 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)
Wells v. North Carolina Department of Correction567 S.E.2d 803 (N.C. Ct. App. 2002)
James Kujawa, Individually and Doing Business as Restaurant Builders, Debtor Richard E. Schwartz v. James Kujawa270 F.3d 578 (8th Cir. 2001)
Schwartz v. Kujawa (In re Kujawa)256 B.R. 598 (8th Cir. BAP 2000)
Enright v. Auto-Owners Insurance2 F. Supp. 2d 1072 (N.D. Ind. 1998)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list