Stuart v. United States

Stuart v. United States, 499 U.S. 967 (1991)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: April 15, 1991
Docket: No. 90-7251
Citations: 499 U.S. 967111 S. Ct. 1599113 L. Ed. 2d 66259 U.S.L.W. 37021991 U.S. LEXIS 2204

Cited by 32 5 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(describing defendant's argument but refusing to find that sentencing entrapment had in fact occurred)

United States v. Mark William Paul Staufer, 38 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 1994)
(no acceptance of responsibility reduction when defendant put the government to its burden of proof at trial by denying any intent to distribute a controlled substance)

United States v. Edgar, 971 F.2d 89 (8th Cir. 1992)
(record does not show that the defendant committed a drug offense “greater than that which he was predisposed to commit”)

United States v. Stein, 973 F.2d 600 (8th Cir. 1992)

Cited by 32 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Franco826 F. Supp. 1168 (N.D. Ill. 1993)
United States v. Gerald Connell960 F.2d 191 (1st Cir. 1992)
United States v. Mark William Paul Staufer38 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 1994)
United States v. Baker63 F.3d 1478 (9th Cir. 1995)
United States v. Sanchez138 F.3d 1410 (11th Cir. 1998)
United States v. Lorenzo Naranjo52 F.3d 245 (9th Cir. 1995)

Most recent

Merriweather v. State294 S.W.3d 52 (Mo. 2009)
Chupp v. State830 N.E.2d 119 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005)
Berger v. Stinson97 F. Supp. 2d 359 (W.D.N.Y. 2000)
United States v. Sanchez138 F.3d 1410 (11th Cir. 1998)
Salama v. State690 N.E.2d 762 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998)
United States v. Roberto Ramirez-Rangel, and Joel Lobo-Osuna103 F.3d 1501 (9th Cir. 1997)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list