South Dakota v. Rosebud Sioux Tribe
South Dakota v. Rosebud Sioux Tribe, 500 U.S. 915 (1991)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(declining to adopt Grady test in RICO context and limiting its application to “offenses arising from a single discrete event”)
-
(“a federal sentence does not begin to run until the defendant is delivered to the place where the sentence is to be served”)
-
("we believe that the appellants' primary contention is that the relationship plus continuity test for a pattern of racketeering under RICO is unconstitutionally vague.... Thus H.J. Inc. is more pertinent than Fort Wayne Books to our discussion.")
-
(“The double jeopardy analysis in ... Grady ... cannot easily be transposed to the RICO context____ Instead, we consider the double jeopardy problem posed by the successive prosecutions [in a RICO case] to be more closely analogous to that in [Garrett ]____”)
Cited by 139 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals63
- Federal District Courts52
- Federal Specialty Courts1
- State Highest Courts11
- State Appellate Courts12
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.