South Dakota v. Spotted Horse
South Dakota v. Spotted Horse, 500 U.S. 928 (1991)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Sup. Ct. S. D. Motion for leave to proceed informa pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed by respondent granted. Certio-rari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(quoting, Matsushita Elec. Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586, 106 S.Ct. 1348, 1356, 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986))
-
(“Conclusory allegations will not suffice to create a genuine issue.”)
Cited by 174 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals48
- Federal District Courts103
- Bankruptcy Courts7
- Military Courts1
- State Highest Courts12
- State Appellate Courts3
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.