Bernal-Rodriguez v. United States
Bernal-Rodriguez v. United States, 501 U.S. 1211 (1991)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 7 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(in remittitur case can appeal issue only if "separate and distinct" claim from subject matter of remittitur)
-
(SUNY is an integral part of the government of New York State, and when it is sued the state is the real party)
-
(“[o]n only one occasion has the Supreme Court struck down a state statute as violative of the. foreign relations power”)
-
(scientist employed by a firm under contract with the National Cancer Institute was a limited purpose public figure)
-
(review of the merits is within court’s discretion)
-
(requiring plaintiffs to establish five separate elements)
Cited by 70 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals20
- Federal District Courts42
- Bankruptcy Courts1
- State Highest Courts3
- State Appellate Courts4
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.