Lopez-Medina v. United States
Lopez-Medina v. United States, 502 U.S. 849 (1991)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(district attorney’s comments that the defendants carved the victim up “like a cheap piece of tenderloin” merely summarized trial evidence with permissible oratorical flair)
-
(a summary judgment motion will not be defeated on the basis of conjecture or surmise)
-
(administrative delay in scheduling a medical procedure caused by negligence does not constitute deliberate indifference)
-
(motion for summary judgment will not be denied on conjecture or assumptions)
Cited by 461 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals49
- Federal District Courts379
- Bankruptcy Courts7
- State Highest Courts15
- State Appellate Courts11
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Commonwealth v. Marinelli
- Rusk v. New York State Thruway Authority
- Cora Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District and Cattaraugus County Civil Service Commission
- Trans Sport, Inc. v. Starter Sportswear, Inc.
- United States v. Juventino Herrera-Rivera, Also Known as Dino, Tito and Tino
- Laird v. Horn
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.