Grizzle v. United States
Grizzle v. United States, 502 U.S. 897 (1991)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 6 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that proof of prior drug activities is more probative than prejudicial)
-
(under Guidelines sections 4Al.l(d), (e), relevant but unadjudicat-ed pre-Guidelines conduct may be used to increase a defendant’s criminal history score with respect to an adjudicated Guidelines offense)
-
(money withheld for deposit into vacation fund was a plan asset)
-
(construing U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(d) & (e))
Cited by 33 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Trustees of the Operating Engineers' Local 324 Pension & Fringe Benefit Funds v. Glencorp, Inc.
- Trustees of the Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds v. Nordstrom
- Plumbers Local 98 Defined Benefit Pension Fund v. M & P Master Plumbers of Michigan, Inc.
- Bannistor v. Ullman
- Cordova v. Johnson
- In re Riverside Electric Co.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.