Cotlow v. Emison

Cotlow v. Emison, 502 U.S. 1022 (1992)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: January 10, 1992
Docket: No. 91-1084
Citations: 502 U.S. 1022112 S. Ct. 855

Cited by 6 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal from D. C. Minn. Motion of appellants to expedite consideration of the jurisdictional statement granted. The order entered December 5, 1991, by the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota staying state court proceedings is vacated.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(vacating order of three-judge district court enjoining state court proceedings where state court was on eve of issuing final judgment and where case involved disputed questions of state constitutional law)

Puerto Rican Legal Def. & Educ. Fund, Inc. v. Gantt, 796 F. Supp. 677 (E.D.N.Y. 1992)

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

David Henderson v. Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of the United States Department of Interior964 F.2d 1179 (D.C. Cir. 1992)
Benavidez v. Eu34 F.3d 825 (9th Cir. 1994)
Frank Longo v. United States Postal Service953 F.2d 790 (2d Cir. 1992)
Lombardo v. Gerard592 N.E.2d 1333 (Mass. App. Ct. 1992)
Puerto Rican Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc. v. Gantt796 F. Supp. 677 (E.D.N.Y. 1992)
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District959 F.2d 381 (2d Cir. 1992)

Most recent

Benavidez v. Eu34 F.3d 825 (9th Cir. 1994)
Lombardo v. Gerard592 N.E.2d 1333 (Mass. App. Ct. 1992)
David Henderson v. Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of the United States Department of Interior964 F.2d 1179 (D.C. Cir. 1992)
Puerto Rican Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc. v. Gantt796 F. Supp. 677 (E.D.N.Y. 1992)
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District959 F.2d 381 (2d Cir. 1992)
Frank Longo v. United States Postal Service953 F.2d 790 (2d Cir. 1992)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list