TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Killian v. Ebbinghaus

Killian v. Ebbinghaus, 111 U.S. 798 (1884)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 5, 1884
Judges
Waite
Citations
111 U.S. 7984 S. Ct. 69728 L. Ed. 5931884 U.S. LEXIS 1844
Syllabus
Mandate — Practice. An appeal was taken from the court below by appellant under an incorrect description, not corresponding with the title in the court below. Under this incorrect title proceedings were conducted to final judgment here and a mandate issued. That mandate is now recalled and a new one issued conforming the title and description to those in the court below.
Summary
This was a motion to correct an error in the mandate issued on the judgment reported in Killian v. Ebbinghaus, 110 U. S. 568.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Waite

Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was brought against the trustees of the German Evangelical Concordia Church, then in possession of the premises in dispute. They answered by that name, setting up their title to the property and their claim to the possession. The record shows a notice by Ebbinghaus, the appellee and com *799 p'lainant below, to the trustees of the German Evangelical Lutheran Concordia Church. The final decree was against the “ trustees or authorities of the said Concordia Church, whether under the name of the trustees of the German Evangelical Concordia Church, or under the name of the trustees of the German Lutheran Evangelical Concordia Church.” The trustees appealed, but in their appeal bond they described themselves as trustees of the German Lutheran Evangelical Concordia Church. The case was entered here promptly and docketed in the name of John G. Killian et al., trusteesw of the German Lutheran Evangelical Concordia Church Appellants v. John W. Ebbinghaus, trustee.

Both parties appeared and argued the case, as presented by the record, on its merits. No objection was made tó the form of the appeal. A mandate which was sent to the court below described the appeal as “taken by John G. Killian et al., trustees of the German Lutheran Evangelical Concordia Church.” As in this there was error, the mandate has been recalled, and we now order that a new mandate issue describing the cause below as between John W.

Ebbinghaus, trustee, complainant, and John G. Killian et al., trustees of the German Evangelical Concordia Church, and August Sievers et al., trustees of the Eirst Reformed church defendants (Equity, No. 5,688) and the appeal as “taken by John G. Killian et al., trustees of the German Evangelical Concordia Church.”

It is so ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1907: 11913: 11916: 11931: 119072026peak 1907 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Garland v. Union Trust Co.1916 OK 24, 154 P. 676
  2. State v. F. B. Williams Cypress Co.61 So. 988 (La. 1913)
  3. Chapman v. St. Stephens Protestant Episcopal, Church, Inc.139 So. 188 (Fla. 1931) · Dissent
  4. State ex rel. Bond v. Taylor119 Tenn. 229 (1907)

Most recent

  1. Chapman v. St. Stephens Protestant Episcopal, Church, Inc.139 So. 188 (Fla. 1931) · Dissent
  2. Garland v. Union Trust Co.1916 OK 24, 154 P. 676
  3. State v. F. B. Williams Cypress Co.61 So. 988 (La. 1913)
  4. State ex rel. Bond v. Taylor119 Tenn. 229 (1907)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list