TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Doe v. Gross

Doe v. Gross, 503 U.S. 950 (1992)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 23, 1992
Docket
No. 91-7393
Citations
503 U.S. 950117 L. Ed. 2d 649
Cited by 14 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Cer-tiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (upholding the following standard: "a preponderance of the evidence with an extra measure of evidentiary protection by reason of specific findings of fact after a careful review of the evidence")
    Mack v. Mack, 618 A.2d 744 (Md. 1993)

Cited by 14 cases

View all citing references →
1993: 41994: 11995: 31996: 31997: 21998: 119932026peak 1993 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Nynex Corporation56 F.3d 151 (D.C. Cir. 1995)
  2. United States v. Doyle121 F.3d 1078 (7th Cir. 1997)
  3. In re Enlargement of Mun. Boundaries691 So. 2d 978 (Miss. 1997)
  4. United States v. Zuno-Arce25 F. Supp. 2d 1087 (C.D. Cal. 1998)
  5. Mich. Coun. 25, Afscme v. Louisiana Homes, Inc511 N.W.2d 696 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994)
  6. Dupree v. Moore831 F. Supp. 1310 (S.D. Miss. 1993)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Zuno-Arce25 F. Supp. 2d 1087 (C.D. Cal. 1998)
  2. United States v. Doyle121 F.3d 1078 (7th Cir. 1997)
  3. In re Enlargement of Mun. Boundaries691 So. 2d 978 (Miss. 1997)
  4. United States v. Neufeld949 F. Supp. 555 (S.D. Ohio 1996)
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Katz's Delicatessen Of Houston Street, Inc.80 F.3d 755 (2d Cir. 1996)
  6. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Department of Mental Health545 N.W.2d 363 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list