Transamerica Insurance v. United States
Transamerica Insurance Co. v. United States
Transamerica Ins. v. United States, 503 U.S. 970 (1992)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 6 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(agency decision, made by head of agency and supported by factual findings, provided "substantial assurance" that the deprivation was "not baseless or unwarranted")
-
(“where a disparity in sentences suggests that a defendant who pleaded not guilty was being penalized for exercising his constitutional right to a trial, the reasons for the disparity must appear in the record”)
Cited by 63 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Clinton
- Dico, Inc. v. Diamond
- Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, Frank J. Kelley, ex rel. State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Frank J. Kelley v. Environmental Protection Agency, William K. Reilly, Administrator, American Bankers Association, Equipment Leasing Association of America, Commercial Finance Association, American Council of Life Insurance, American College of Real Estate Lawyers
- United States v. David Dominic Necoechea
- United States v. Lewis Francis (97-1129) and Louay Francis (97-1130)
- UNITED STATES of America v. James Robert HERNANDEZ
Most recent
- Ostrowski v. Cape Transit Corp.
- Solow v. United States (In re Johnson Rehabilitation Nursing Home, Inc.)
- United States v. Lewis Francis (97-1129) and Louay Francis (97-1130)
- Fina, Inc. v. Arco
- UNITED STATES of America v. James Robert HERNANDEZ
- 45 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 449, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6157, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7730, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,106 United States of America v. Edward P. Collicott, Sr.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.