Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc.

Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., 503 U.S. 977 (1992)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: April 6, 1992
Docket: No. 91-1242
Judges: Certiorari
Citations: 503 U.S. 977112 S. Ct. 1603118 L. Ed. 2d 31660 U.S.L.W. 36881992 U.S. LEXIS 2242

Cited by 41 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(“We believe that Berkey Photo misapplied the elements of Section 2 by concluding that a firm violates Section 2 merely by obtaining a competitive advantage in the second market, even in the absence of an attempt to monopolize the leveraged market.”)

United States v. Eastman Kodak Co., 853 F. Supp. 1454 (W.D.N.Y. 1994)

Cited by 41 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Marshall v. Inn on Madeline Island610 N.W.2d 670 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000)
H.A.W. v. Manuel524 N.W.2d 10 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994)
Continental Airlines, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.824 F. Supp. 689 (S.D. Tex. 1993)
PPG Industries, Inc. v. Pilkington Plc825 F. Supp. 1465 (D. Ariz. 1993)
Independent Entertainment Group, Inc. v. National Basketball Ass'n853 F. Supp. 333 (C.D. Cal. 1994)
Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.980 F.2d 171 (3d Cir. 1992)

Most recent

Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp.670 N.W.2d 11 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003)
In re Pacific Gas & Electric Company295 B.R. 635 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2003)
In re Northwest Airlines Corp.208 F.R.D. 174 (E.D. Mich. 2002)
Lawrence v. Chapter 7 Trustee (In re Lawrence)251 B.R. 630 (S.D. Fla. 2000)
Eleven Line, Inc. v. North Texas State Soccer Ass'n213 F.3d 198 (5th Cir. 2000)
Marshall v. Inn on Madeline Island610 N.W.2d 670 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list