Market/Media Research, Inc. v. Union Tribune Publishing Co.

Mkt./Media Research, Inc. v. Union Tribune Publ'g Co., 506 U.S. 824 (1992)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 5, 1992
Docket: No. 91-1953
Citations: 506 U.S. 824113 S. Ct. 79121 L. Ed. 2d 4361 U.S.L.W. 32571992 U.S. LEXIS 5688

Cited by 39 3 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(dismissing spouse’s loss of consortium claim only because the underlying § 1983 action was not successful)

Robinson v. Johnson, 975 F. Supp. 950 (S.D. Tex. 1996)
(telephone calls and mail sent to Ohio insufficient for personal jurisdiction)

Reynolds v. Int'l Amateur Athletic Fed'n, the Athletic Congress, 23 F.3d 1110 (6th Cir. 1994)

Cited by 39 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Brown v. Bryan County, OK67 F.3d 1174 (5th Cir. 1995)
Brown v. Bryan County53 F.3d 1410 (5th Cir. 1995)
James T. Conti v. Pneumatic Products Corporation and H. Michael McCurry977 F.2d 978 (6th Cir. 1992)
Gonzales v. Westbrook118 F. Supp. 2d 728 (W.D. Tex. 2000)
Cruz v. Kentucky Action Park, Inc.950 F. Supp. 210 (N.D. Ohio 1996)
Brown v. Bryan County, OK67 F.3d 1174 (5th Cir. 1995)

Most recent

Stickel v. Finkelstein (In re Huffy Corp.)358 B.R. 724 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2006)
Holley-Adkins v. Holley492 F. Supp. 2d 776 (S.D. Ohio 2005)
Progeny Marketing v. Farmers & Merchants BankNo. M2003-02011-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 7, 2005)
Lucite International, Inc. v. Peter Runciman, PH.D.No. W2004-00314-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2005)
Samuel Humphreys v. Richard SelveyNo. W2002-02788-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2004)
Humphreys v. Selvey154 S.W.3d 544 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list