W. S. v. R. W.

W. S. v. R. W., 506 U.S. 880 (1992)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 5, 1992
Docket: No. 92-5110
Citations: 506 U.S. 880113 S. Ct. 229121 L. Ed. 2d 16561 U.S.L.W. 32621992 U.S. LEXIS 5950

Cited by 4

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Samuel C. Stoia v. United States22 F.3d 766 (7th Cir. 1994)
Edward Spreitzer v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections and Richard B. Gramley, Warden, Pontiac Correctional Center114 F.3d 1435 (7th Cir. 1997)
Burris v. Parke948 F. Supp. 1310 (N.D. Ind. 1996)
Hough v. United States177 F. Supp. 3d 782 (W.D.N.Y. 2016)

Most recent

Hough v. United States177 F. Supp. 3d 782 (W.D.N.Y. 2016)
Edward Spreitzer v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections and Richard B. Gramley, Warden, Pontiac Correctional Center114 F.3d 1435 (7th Cir. 1997)
Burris v. Parke948 F. Supp. 1310 (N.D. Ind. 1996)
Samuel C. Stoia v. United States22 F.3d 766 (7th Cir. 1994)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list