Stephen v. United States District Court
Stephen v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California
Stephen v. United States Dist. Court, 513 U.S. 1163 (1995)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 6 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(finding severance not required where defendants did not present mutually antagonistic defenses and State did not introduce incriminating statement by non-testifying co-defendant)
-
(discussing difference for purposes of harmless error analysis between structural and mere trial errors)
-
(no Faretta inquiry required in the absence of an explicit assertion of the right to self-representation)
-
(state’s failure to object to the petitioner’s claim on procedural grounds waived procedural default objection)
-
(co-conspirator tried as co-defendant and third party, recruited by defendants to join in murder scheme, testified against both)
Cited by 42 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.